Zerush@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 15 days agoProduct improved by AIlemmy.mlimagemessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up1488arrow-down18
arrow-up1480arrow-down1imageProduct improved by AIlemmy.mlZerush@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 15 days agomessage-square30linkfedilink
minus-squareLe_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 days agoyou’re misunderstanding the analogy. this is a fundamental problem with analogies.
minus-squareZerush@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·15 days agoI understand that adding an chatbot to an product don’t make it more practical, when you find even a Toaster with AI. Also an design made with ChatGPT insteatof research can also result in an absurd crap, halucinating not only in chats.
minus-squareVampire [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·14 days ago‘fundamental’ would mean it applies to good analogies, not just wrong ones
minus-squareLe_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 days agoit does. an analogy is not 1:1 and if it was it wouldn’t be an analogy, it would just be the thing.
minus-squareVampire [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·14 days agoThat’s getting a bit too vague for me. How is giving people a chatbot like giving paraplegics pedals? Nobody has explained it yet.
you’re misunderstanding the analogy. this is a fundamental problem with analogies.
I understand that adding an chatbot to an product don’t make it more practical, when you find even a Toaster with AI. Also an design made with ChatGPT insteatof research can also result in an absurd crap, halucinating not only in chats.
‘fundamental’ would mean it applies to good analogies, not just wrong ones
it does. an analogy is not 1:1 and if it was it wouldn’t be an analogy, it would just be the thing.
That’s getting a bit too vague for me.
How is giving people a chatbot like giving paraplegics pedals? Nobody has explained it yet.