• Laser@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That can be easily done with AOSP, to my knowledge there’s no Google stuff in there. Which is exactly what they’re using right now

      • mathemachristian@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        There still is some google stuff in there, like for example phoning google servers to check internet connectivity among other stuff.

        • rentar42@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes, but those minor traces are easy enough to remove, especially if you don’t care about being “ceritified” by Google (i.e. are not planning to run the Google services).

          • mathemachristian@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Right but the topic was about google’s data harvesting and what I meant was that you can’t just grab any AOSP distribution if you want to minimize that, you need to pick one that replaces the parts that send data to google. LineageOS for example still phones google for quite a number of services.

            As far as “easy to remove” goes, I think that’s kind of debatable if you want to do it in a way that’s sustainable long term considering the effort that goes into e.g. GrapheneOS or DivestOS.

            Edit: here is a list of the kind of stuff you need to watch out for if you want to minimize the data sent to google

            https://divestos.org/pages/network_connections

  • pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nice! And they will probably differentiate from the competition by allowing GPL applications and sideloading, and having a total control for your privacy and no tracking, right?

    Right?

    • Jagermo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      In the beginning? Sure. Later? Well, you know, security and all, think of the kids!

      • Valon_Blue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        See, that’s the situation where we just don’t use them. I’m talking about wiping the original OS and putting something that’s really FOSS in its place.

  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    oh great, yet another platform that will use free software to restrict what people can do with their computing devices 🤮

    how is this supposed to be a good thing? 🙄

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Curious if it’ll be opensource and mobile linux distro. If Amazon gets into the mobile linux game, the mobile phone market might change radically.

    • PostaL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You seem confused. Amazon is in the business of stealing open source project in order to sell them as AWS services, not making them.

  • TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The author is exited but I’m not. I am not a big fan of corporations taking the free work of FOSS developers and turning it into a proprietary dystopia.

    • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think that having a strong public domain is good for everyone. For instance properties like Sherlock Holmes really took off once it was in the public domain and people could write spin-offs and whatnot without worry that a copyright lawyer would come along and sue them.

      Linux is the same thing, Amazon using the kernel and stuff to build an OS on doesn’t take anything away from anyone else who uses Linux as a desktop or server environment, and in fact can lead to some good pass back, even if it is just that the devices are easier to root. Take a look at the Open-wrt project, where Linksys built their router on top of a Linux kernel and it led to a whole ecosystem of open routers. People went out of their way to buy a WRT-42G just with the intent of rooting it, and Linksys got their money either way.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If it were anyone other than Amazon or Apple.

        Speaking of which, isn’t MacOS Linux based these days? How much have they contributed back? (Genuine question)

        • deur@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It’s pretty annoying you replied to someone’s nice, well thought out comment with your own bullshit. Then speculated about something you could have googled in 7 seconds max.

        • n0m4n@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          A quick search confirms that MacOS is based from proprietary BSD UNIX code. It is not compatible with Linux

  • pan_troglodytes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    hopefully they’ll design some package manager incompatible with android at the most basic level - and then double down when it’s proven to be a huge mistake. a good tick upwards for dev jobs, but the time for actual competition was over 10 years ago. this will fail miserably.