Coopr8

Here’s a thing about LLMs, they will effectively make laws like this meaningless. Law comes in to enforce against a company building a program to block ads, extension goes off market. Someone asks their LLM “create an extension function referencing the same data set for my browser that performs the same function” boom new extension with no central point of distribution. Share the prompt on a forum, now everyone has a custom ad blocker. Or not so far down the road, LLM is directly built into the browser, no extension needed just prompt “do not display known advertisements on pages I request before loading, but perform background activity which gives feedback to the site that ads have loaded” boom done.

In a way, local LLMs are like distributed applications, they make enforcement against specific program functions pretty much impossible.

deleted by creator

I’m wondering if this in part has to do with hitting average efficiency targets. By nerfing this car for most users, who won’t really care or notice the difference in urban driving, they carve out more tollerance for lower efficiency in their SUVs/ICE cars while still hitting the average efficiency spec that gives them some government incentives and marketing opportunities. $700/car for a lifetime subscription is not a huge economic motivator in the scheme of things.

So the ISP redirects the request from the primary host to the CloudFlare cache under some conditions? but wouldn’t that be ineffective at blocking the sites of the browser still attempts to pull from the primary host first? I’m assuming this must be mediated by the ISP somehow otherwise it would just be a browser setting to only pull from the primary host of the domain.

I don’t understand how CloudFlare is intermediating the traffick in this case. How can CloudFlare block the sites if they aren’t hosted on CloudFlare or using CloudFlare services? Are they acting as an ISP in the UK?

South Carolina’s Republican Party is not known for electing diversity.