• Nima@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    exactly. so I’m wondering what the purpose is for its need.

    (edit: apologies- the phone number. needing the phone number.)

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      What? You use a secure messenger to send secure messages. It doesn’t make sense for a secure messenger to offer sending insecure messages (SMS).

      Edit: oh, you’re probably referring to why it requires a phone number. This seems to be due to abuse/spam prevention, as otherwise creating new accounts to spam people with is basically free.

      • Nima@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        using the phone number is still a pretty unnecessary risk, imho.

        there’s no real need for it any longer.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Do you have a better approach to prevent spam in mind? Without a barrier of entry it becomes a serious issue.

          • Nima@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Spam prevention? Ive got spam on Signal. Having your phone number be the barrier of entry doesn’t make Signal a flawless app.

            and considering i can just plug a google voice number in, I’m not sure its the best barrier.