• mintiefresh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Wish more of my contact list would switch over to Signal. It’s nearly the same. I don’t see why it’s so hard for some people to just start using Signal instead of WhatsApp.

    Oh well.

    • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Because people are beyond stupid. “i dont want to download another app” - while having an app for almost every other store and bullshit game and whatever

  • network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ya it’d be better if it didn’t require a phone number but it’s a solid start as it’s build up a user base over the past decade. Matrix is good but I know far less people that use it and it’ll be a long time of growing with nerdy/geeky communities before it starts getting more mainstream users

  • Nima@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    signal requires a phone number and won’t even allow you to send sms to those that aren’t on signal.

    its better, but still not great.

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It used to function as a fallback SMS/MMS messenger (like how iMessage does) but when Google started moving to convert Android from SMS/MMS to RCS Signal made the hard decision to cut the fallback functionality rather than follow Google’s new framework.

      I personally hope once the dust settles Signal designs a RCS engine and restores the fallback functionality.

      • oppy1984@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah killing the sms function was basically a deal breaker for me, no matter how much I tried I could only get three people to use Signal, the rest were all sms. When the sms feature was removed 2 of the 3 dropped Signal completely, so now the only person I know who still uses it is my mom and even she still flips back and forth between Signal and Google messages when texting me.

        I still have Signal on my phone and suggest it people when they ask how to contact me, but everyone just wants to text my phone number.

  • eodur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    How about Delta Chat? At least as secure as Signal, open source, and decentralized.

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    A truly ethical replacement would not need a phone number

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      And would have FOSS implementations of reference server & client + an openly specified protocol.

      Like Matrix.

      • Flipper@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Matrix still has it’s problems. All the meta data is still saved on every server permanently.

        There is still space to improve from there.

  • Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Anyone using Session? I finally got most of my friends and family on Signal so I’m not gonna switch but I just heard about it, seems pretty good.

  • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I like Signal. I even got all my close friends and family on it, specifically to message me because I won’t use whatsapp. The PIN reminders are annoying it enough to be legitimately holding it back from mass appeal imho

        • Typotyper@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I think it was meant as a security feature in case someone picked up your unlocked phone. It perhaps someone cracked your front screen passcode. I know if you forget your password and have to reset it you lose all previous conversations. It’s very secure this way. Bit of a pain… but secure.

          • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            That’s not even what it is lol.

            And as the other commenter alluded to, defaults matter. You’re not replacing the thing everyone is already using by pitching “here’s an alternative that is better in ways which don’t affect your usage at all, and also you have to dig into the settings to turn off the optional daily popups”

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Don’t let perfection stand in the way of good enough
      It may not be the holy grail, but moving away from Meta-owned Whatsapp is already a pretty significant improvement

      • Luca@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I agree and it would be much better if people would use Signal instead of WhatsApp, but I think there’s still one problem.

        Due to how messaging platforms work, every time you switch you lose pretty much everything (messages, media, etc) This makes switching very hard even for a nerd like me, because if Signal is not “perfect” it means that I will have to switch again at some point and lose everything again.

        • lemonuri@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Thats a problem with silos (where one owner hosts all the servers) in general. You will have to switch the entire ecosystem once the inevitable enshitification sets in. It’s a good idea to switch to something open source and federated (where many different non profit organisations and even self hosting individuals host many different servers). That way you can migrate your history and contacts to another server of necessary but never have to switch the ecosystem again. Think it how email works, it’s the best known federated system. If you don’t like you email provider anymore you can just chose another one and still keep your contacts and messages on a client like Thunderbird forever. Xmpp and matrix are the hottest candidates in my opinion, but you can check the messenger matrix that was linked in a comment above to see what suits you best.

          • Luca@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Well said, the problem really is that Signal isn’t federated. I’m keeping an eye on Matrix for now.

        • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’ve been using Signal for years and my database was getting really bloated with media, attachments, etc but I didn’t want to delete it all. I used this and it’s incredible:

          https://github.com/bepaald/signalbackup-tools

          Just make a backup from within signal, copy that backup file to your PC, then run this tool. The commands I used make an HTML webpage that looks just like the signal messenger, along with a way of searching your messages. You can choose different commands to export however you like.

          I used:

          signalbackup-tools [input] [passphrase] --exporthtml [directory] --split --searchpage --originalfilenames

          So while this doesn’t help you move off your current messenger, you don’t have to worry that your data/messages will be lost in Signal.

        • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You can save any media you care about. And Signal can backup your chats if that history is important to you.

          • Luca@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Sure, but if I switch from Signal to another potentially better messaging app down the line my chat history will get fragmented

        • Einar@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Most of the alternatives mentioned have such low adoption that they aren’t truly viable options yet - no matter how much we wish otherwise.

          And I say that not as a critic - I actually use Matrix, XMPP, and Jitsi myself. But guess how many of my friends, family, or colleagues are on them?

          Exactly.

          That’s why I recommend Signal. At least there, people are likely to find folks they already know.

      • thedruid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Be careful with that ol’ Chestnut. Circumstances may dictate perfection, where less than such may be catastrophic.

        • Humanius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          In that case it wouldn’t be “good enough”. But I don’t think this is such an all-or-nothing situation.

  • Humanius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    After Trump was elected and inaugurated, Signal has finally been gaining some steam here in the Netherlands.

    It’s still an American company, so it’s not ideal. But it’s still significantly better better than letting a tech giant like Facebook have control over the most commonly used chat app.

    WhatsApp needs to go and Signal is the most likely way in which we can achieve that. We can worry about the American elephant in the room later.

    • viking@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There is threema, a Swiss messenger that gained some popularity earlier since they had end to end encryption before whatsapp.

      Unfortunately the source code is not open (even though they do get annual audits with public reports), and the client costs 3 EUR or something (once).

      • Humanius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah, but Threema has basically no momentum behind it at all at this point.
        I’m putting my social capital behind the option that currently stands the most chance of beating out Whatsapp

          • Humanius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Then by all means keep that momentum going. I’m just looking at this from a Dutch perspective, where Signal is seeing by far the most growth.

            • rhabarba@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 hours ago

              You can help making it stronger. That’s what I did in Germany: if people want to contact me, I usually give them my Threema ID first, everything else comes later.

              • Humanius@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                But my goal is not to move to Threema, my goal is to move away from Whatsapp.
                Signal fits the bill while expending far less social capital convincing people to use it.

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        And Switzerlands records in terms of privacy sadly is far worse than most people think - even with the last attack being repelled.

        Matrix (preferably on a non-matrix.org instance) currently is the preferable non US and privacy friendly way.

        • rhabarba@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I don’t know - this hype about Matrix reminds me of XMPP which was similarly popular a decade ago. Today, nobody even remembers it anymore.

          • philpo@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Which hype? Matrix as a protocol is used for a decade now, especially by various big governments (French, Luxembourg and German governmental messenger, various German states, German and Polish armed forces, German healthcare messenger, various smaller projects in Latin America), is bridgeable (I currently have it bridged to Whatsapp and Signal amongst others) but I really don’t see a hype - on the contrary I only see people predicting me the immediate apocalypse of Matrix for 5 years now, currently due to matrix.org (one of a hundred instances) introducing a premium account model for the most cost intensive (heavily media sharing)users. (See below for that).

    • Kualdir@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Sadly many still don’t want to switch. My most active chats are in signal now but the large majority of chats are still on whatsapp

        • Humanius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Not all of them.

          I have a non-official chat group with some colleagues, and a chat group for the neighbourhood that are not likely moving just because I am refusing to use Whatsapp. It would just result in me missing out on those chat groups.

          Currently I just have both installed, and that is also how I try to convince people to install and try out Signal.

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    It’s ethical because it runs on donations and has a non-profit business model.

    Meta likely spends at least $1 billion a year running WhatsApp.

    Please donate to Signal if you use it.

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Overdramatic blog post,sorry. I can’t stand the whole “fremmium” crybabies that then literally recommend the next freemium or “non transparent funding model” service… And don’t understand the fundamental difference between the Protocol and one of its implementations.

        Matrix as a protocol is solid and is used far beyond the Matrix messenger. (e.g. the French and German governmental messenger, the German healthcare messenger,various armies,etc.) With a lot of commits coming from there - but not enough funding,that is definitely an issue.

        The current issue with Freemium is solely limited to the matrix.org instance. There are hundreds of federated instances out there that aren’t Freemium and won’t have the need to go that way as they are funded differently.(e.g. the Lemmy Instance I am currently writing from, feddit - we are financed through other means) As they are federated it doesn’t matter - and honestly, I personally tend to see this as a good thing - it will lead users away from matrix.org towards other instances, making the whole network more reliable and decentralized.

        There are two other issues that are relevant, though: The way the foundation is run is not ideal, definitely - there are and were issues and I am not happy with some management decisions, but at least they are getting somewhat better recently (government board). The whole protocol does not evolve as fast as it should be and this is an issue,especially as a it also affects bug fixing. As an executive for a (much smaller) company myself I see management issues and infighting due to lack of leadership within the foundation and I am not happy with that. The second issue is Element as a company that does things companies do - focus on making money. This in theory would be a good thing if Element would send enough money AND effort upstream to seriously bring the whole project forward. For a long time this seemed to be the case,but licensing issues and the “stale” development off Element X(Matrix 2.0) has me questioning that as well - but recent changes show us hope in that regard. We also need to carefully reconsider if element is keeping too much"closed" source code for monetized features and what influence VC really has. In conclusion: We need better leadership for Matrix,more transparency and more funding.

        The good news is: It doesn’t mattter too much - if the current foundation fucks up and goes belly up it is not the end of Matrix - the protocol is decentralized enough and the licencing of the core components permissive enough for another (better?) foundation to start over. There are dozends of clients available and we have alternative servers available by now.

        The funding part nevertheless is my major pet peeve here. All around Europe governments try to get rid of US tech - and use Matrix protocol based products. But they hardly if ever fund that. If Germany, France, Poland and Luxembourg (the big users) would give 5€ per year for each client they implement all issues with funding would be gone, Matrix 2.0 would be available in a few months, VC could be pushed out of elements AND they could mandate more transparency.

        The issue with funding is relevant for all NGOs and especially in tech. Running servers costs a fuckton of money.

        Signal has a respectable amount of backers but is a centralized protocol and when Trump does something shady moneywise their infrastructure,money and possibly even people will be gone within 24 hours.

        Threema has a more sustainable business model but Switzerland is,well, difficult, in terms of privacy and intelligence services overreach, especially towards traffic pointing to foreign servers or hosts.

        Revolt is a centralized service with no federation,limited selfhosting capabilities,with unclear funding(we are waiting for a financial transparency report for ages now).

        Polyproto is still not quite there feature wise and funding, etc. is unclear.

        Delta Chat is indeed an option but has massive technical limitations.

        That leaves XMPP as the sole big competition if you want non-centralised, non-US based, privacy friendly, messaging.

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That blog post was my reason to double down on Matrix.