• Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ok great but how did they figure out you could EAT IT if you did a shitload of seemingly random shit to it that you don’t have to do with, like, any other crop?

    • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sounds like you’re assuming step 1 of eating it was processing it into bread. Beyond that, ancient people eventually tried to eat everything. Seeds, grains, and nuts were not uncommon.

      • Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can boil whole grain wheat down into porridge. It’s not the go-to use for wheat now, but the rice cooking method still provides a nutritious meal.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah makes sense, thats always kind of how I thought it went down. Can’t be picky about your calories, can ya, great great great great great great great granpappy Cruxifux.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      All you need to do to make wheat edible is soak it in water to make it soft enough to chew. Wheat in water is “gruel”.

      You can improve upon it by boiling, which will dehydrate the gruel into a primitive bread. The drained, starchy liquid, if left to sit for awhile, will become a primitive ale. Grinding makes it easier to eat.

      Every dietary use is an evolutionary progression from soaking wheat in water.

      • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yup, it’s not so much that wheat requires all of this processing, it just makes it tastier and easier to eat.

        I reckon that after inventing farming, people probably just had a lot more time on their hands, so they sat around trying to come up with ways to avoid having to eat the same boring gruel every day.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I reckon that after inventing farming, people probably just had a lot more time on their hands,

          AFAIK farming actually took a lot more work hours than hunting+gathering, it’s just less risky. But yeah, simple soaked or boiled grain is pretty boring compared to meat, berries and nuts.

          • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I mean, people obviously still engaged in hunting and gathering (they do to this day) to enrich their diet, it just wasn’t as crucial to survival.

            Also, most of the work of farming happens in the spring and the fall (i.e. sowing and harvesting seasons). The rest of the year it’s pretty hands off, which gives you plenty of time to engage in other activities.

            • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Sure, but hunter-gatherers still have tons of free time. There are still people who live like that, people have observed and studied them.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 days ago

      You don’t have to do all of that to eat it, you just have to do all of that to make bread. You can make bread from oats, you can also process it less and make porridge.

      • Anivia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can also just straight up eat it. Yeah, you’ll get runny shits from eating excessive amounts of fiber, but that’s probably the first way it was eaten

        • Soulcreator@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean you’ll probably get runny shits from eating it due to the excess fiber, but I’m fairly certain the ancient nomadic tribes who first started eating wheat like that probably had significantly more fiber in their diets than modern man and eating it like that would probably be far less of a shock to their system than us puny fiber weaklings.

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            You are correct but no need to say “modern man”. Biologically we are the same as those humans. We would just need to adjust to the new diet. Our bodies can still handle their lifestyle

            • Soulcreator@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              To clarify by modern man, I meant a human living in the year 2026 who eats a “modern diet” of (at least partially) processed foods with significantly lower fiber intake than that of a preindustrial man. (Obviously this would be excluding currently living humans who are living in tribal conditions, such as those living in North Sentinel Island.)

              I was not attempting to imply that those living at that time were of a different species than homosapiens. To be honest if they were a different species I’m not sure my comment would have made sense as different homo species would likely have subtle differences in their digestive tracks than homosapiens.

            • Consti@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Our bodies never stopped evolving. Where do you think lactose intolerance (or lack thereof) is coming from? Originally it was just a few that could drink milk, now it’s a significantly higher percentage of the population.

            • lad@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I think modern can be used in the sense of being not adjusted to harsher conditions