• SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Yeah fake. No way you can get 90%+ using chatGPT without understanding code. LLMs barf out so much nonsense when it comes to code. You have to correct it frequently to make it spit out working code.

    • threeduck@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      Are you guys just generating insanely difficult code? I feel like 90% of all my code generation with o1 works first time? And if it doesn’t, I just let GPT know and it fixes it right then and there?

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You mean o3 mini? Wasn’t it on the level of o1, just much faster and cheaper? I noticed no increase in code quality, perhaps even a decrease. For example it does not remember things far more often, like variables that have a different name. It also easily ignores a bunch of my very specific and enumerated requests.

        • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          03 something… i think the bigger version….
          but, i saw a video where it wrote a working game of snake, and then wrote an ai training algorithm to make an ai that could play snake… all of the code ran on the first try….
          could be a lie though, i dunno….

          • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 minutes ago

            Asking it to write a program that already exists in it’s entirety with source code publicly posted, and having that work is not impressive.

            That’s just copy pasting