Reddeet
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days ago

Kash Patel Is Polygraphing FBI Staff to Find Out if They’re Being Mean About Him

www.thedailybeast.com

external-link
message-square
103
link
fedilink
725
external-link

Kash Patel Is Polygraphing FBI Staff to Find Out if They’re Being Mean About Him

www.thedailybeast.com

empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days ago
message-square
103
link
fedilink
The Trump loyalist has subjected dozens of his own team to the lie-detector test.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/32819644

alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    government of fragile masculinities

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      So wait… It’s not Tiny Dick Syndrome?

  • Deadeyegai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    7 days ago

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      At least he doesn’t look paranoid…

  • AskThinkingTim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 days ago

    Enforcing polygraph testing will invariably make people less trusting of you. There needs to specific reasons that target specific people.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      As if anyone trusted Patel anyway.

  • toppy@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 days ago

    Is polygraph test reliable ? Doesn’t it fall under pseudoscience ?

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      6 days ago

      It is not reliable at all, and yes, it is widely considered to be psuedoscience. Yes, this is a batshit insane scenario

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Yes, morons still believe in it, yes, he is a moron.

        That and just looking for an excuse.

    • Peer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      You can even train to beat them, so it’s definitely not a reliable method.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        And, I would assume, if anyone had done that training it would be FBI agents.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Lol right? This seems more like a “can you beat a polygraph test” test, than a loyalty test

    • That Weird Vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s more of an anxiety-detector. It has no basis in fact.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It measures things accurately but this has absolutely nothing to do with identifying if someone is telling the truth or not.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 days ago

    MAGA: The real snowflakes

    • HowAbt2day@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 days ago

      The “original” snowflakes. “I can’t drink from the same water fountain as a colored person!” Type of people.

  • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 days ago

    What a dork-ass loser.

  • frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 days ago

    Real leaders don’t need to be paranoid about what their underlings think about them. Fascism is more fragile than it appears.

    • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      7 days ago

      “[Their] need for control is so desperate because it is so unnatural. Tyranny requires constant effort. It breaks, it leaks. Authority is brittle. Oppression is the mask of fear.”

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        Fear and greed. Who is that quote by? It’s great.

        • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          7 days ago

          Believe it or not, it’s from the Star Wars tv series “Andor” of all places. That show was really too good for its source material.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Real leaders would take the time to understand why someone doesn’t like them, do a little self reflection to see if it’s either a valid point or just a perception issue, and then work to fix the issue if there is one. If it’s just a person who just doesn’t like them but is good at their job, just ignore it. If they are truly not a good fit or just a bad actor who just thrives in negativity, then you either find a better fit for them or then you fire them.

      I’m very much a pleaser type personality but if someone doesn’t like me for whatever reason, I don’t really sweat it if it doesn’t affect me personally. Most people like me but not everyone and that’s ok. This constant need to be surrounded by yes men and sycophants is just disturbing.

    • t_berium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      True. And real leaders don’t want to lead.

  • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    literally a 30 rock episode

  • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’ve never seen such a clear-cut case of fucking crazy eyes in a “man:”

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s drug induced and you cannot convince me it isn’t.

  • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    What a bitch.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Good thing polygraphs are junk science that doesn’t work literally at all.

    • MNByChoice@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      Good thing the system already selects for people that can pass polygraphs without much issue.
      It is also junk technology.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wouldn’t FBI agents be able to pass a “lie detector” test? Has anyone told Kash they aren’t actual lie detectors?

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      7 days ago

      Polygraphs have always been close to useless even for normal people. Anyone being interrogated isnyoing to be nervous and likely set them off.

      However, you have to be slighlty, remotely intelligent to understand that nuance. And that is not an affliction any Trump cabinet appointee has.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Polygraphs provide authoritarians the excuse to get rid of people.

        The same way that scientology uses auditing. The point is to instil fear and doubt into whomever you’re measuring so that you can manipulate them.

        So, they are extremely useful.

  • Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    Damn dude that’s some serious trump energy

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    The fragilest of beings

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Republicans/Conservatives in a nutshell.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 days ago

    Isn’t the FBI trained to beat polygraphs though?

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Only in as much as they know it’s bunk that only works if the participant believes it does.

Not The Onion@lemmy.world

nottheonion@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !nottheonion@lemmy.world

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 854 users / day
  • 4.48K users / week
  • 8.81K users / month
  • 19.5K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 17.2K subscribers
  • 1.68K Posts
  • 59.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • kescusay@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org