• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Clearly everybody’s memory is fucking shit because the same dictator was in charge in 2018.

        • nroth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It got a lot worse this time because he brought all his people in. The old administration started with misalignment and some competent people. The administrators were less willing to break laws. So that one was better.

          A year ago, I used to still list living in America as among the things I’m grateful for. I don’t do that anymore because then I think of the places I’d rather live.

          I really hope this new craziness and volatility is temporary, but I wonder if it is. We could become the next Argentina if not.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Had the wrong ideas, but also a lack of competence to follow through as well. Also the global scenario wasn’t quite as grim.

          The best outcome would have been no Trump terms at all, and failing that just a single term. But if we had to have two Trump terms I think we would have been better off having them consecutive instead of breaking it up. Because of his loss and then eventual win:

          • His sore loser syndrome kicked in hard and made him more actively want to undermine democracy itself.
          • His tangle with the justice system also had him undermining the justice system.
          • It gave the Project2025 assholes a whole 4 years to scheme how to leverage a Trump win, and now we have a pure PJ2025 administration.
          • It distanced moderate republican leadership who assumed Trump was done, leaving Trump only with the worst of the MAGA sticking by him at the top.

          His first term was moderated because he somewhat abided traditional input and his administration was a mix. He did a lot of the same wrong things generally but failed enough to significantly mitigate the harm. His anti-immigrant rhetoric was real, but also he didn’t care enough to actually follow through as hard as his administration has this time around.

          Though I do agree, I wasn’t exactly excited about 2018.

      • absentbird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Fuck 2018, take me to 2026 when the year of the Linux desktop empowers us to run sudo impeach now

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Every year in history is the year of the Linux desktop the only year except for the current year.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          TBH I really want to believe we can remove all 20 Republicans up for election and lose no ground to them in the midterms, which is the minimum we would need to reach the 67 impeachment requirement.

          But I kind of don’t believe it, largely because people are treating the DNC as if they’re the ones gutting medicaid and climate science.

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 minutes ago

            Nobody is saying that, it’s just a straw man in your head. We criticize the dems for being anti-worker, pro-billionaire, and pro-war crime.

  • floo@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    How on earth did it take so long? I’ve been copystruck by these assholes at least three or four dozen times in the 30 years I’ve been pirating … Stuff.

      • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Imperialism is a strong noun. Sure they’ve benefited greatly off the back of US imperialism, but Jesus, condemn us all. It’s not like they didn’t write “Disposable Heros” or “One.” Sure they can be litigious twats, but saying they’re pro imperialism is peak brain rot.

        • zod000@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I just assumed that Lars was controlling the rest of them like puppets through an elaborate drum kit at the back of the stage. The Metallica that wrote One is long gone.

        • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Indeed, condemn us all. So where’s the part where these “apolitical” cowards-at-best deserve your defence, again?

            • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Go punch a Nazi. Or downvote. Maybe picket The Onion headquarters if that’s your fancy? If this “slander” holds no weight, then why are you wasting your breath here?

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Owning the rights to copy and distribute your own creative works = imperialism

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Napster programmers demographic, it seems at times! Lol

            That, and the “banned from Reddit” demographic. Two major demographics.

        • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          45
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Rofl. Imagine thinking I called out Metallica for taking down Napster alone.

          Their shit’s been used in DoD/weapons-contractor videos for decades, and the moment the MAGAts start to turn on Trump over the Epstien stuff, Metallica is suddenly anti-drone, for the first time ever.

          Next you’ll tell us NASCAR brought down the Berlin Wall.

          • Mîm@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Next you’ll tell us NASCAR brought down the Berlin Wall.

            Wenn all know that it was the Hoff who brought that wall down!

            • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              That was twelve years ago, and “please don’t use our music for torture” is the bare minimum for people who want plausible deniability without actually doing anything about the fact that people are being tortured.

              • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                I’m not sure what you expect from them. It should be enough that they don’t want to be a part of the machine and have spoken out against being a part of that, but you want more. Perfection is the enemy of good.

                • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  They are celebrities, not political candidates. “Vote Blue No Matter Who” is disingenuous when the DNC weilds it, and not even remotely applicable to rich-ass celebrities whose entire political stance is to try to be “apolitical”.

            • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Don’t confuse the awesome free service that once was with the paid brand that’s still around. Still funny all the effort and good-will Metallica wasted to go after one site when plenty of alternatives existed.

        • floo@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          No, but when it came time for them to stand up for their rights, they were total dicks about it. There was a right way to handle the situation, but they chose the wrong way.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Policing the speech of other people = authoritarianism, yes.

          Copyright is a government-granted (and enforced) monopoly. Under anarchy, no one would benefit from copyright protection, at least not the same way we have it now.

          People could voluntarily police their own speech to stay in an association… but I don’t know how/if that would scale.

  • Sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    23 hours ago

    When reached for comment, James Hetfield responded, “YEAH-YEAAAAH, WHOA.”

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      36 minutes ago

      Works created by the U.S. government do not benefit from copyright protection.

      I don’t believe either the government in general or congress in specific have the blanket ability to ignore copyrights held by others.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        This is because works created by the government used tax money to pay for it; meaning it belongs to everyone who pays taxes. This is why american video games don’t need special permission to use US military hardware names or depictions, but would have to pay royalties for using brands like Winchester, H&K, or Fabrique Nationale.

      • Hugin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That’s stuff created by the government however there are also fair use provisions carved out for the government. I’ve had military guys claim the govt has complete fair use which I doubt.

        I know congress can ignore copyright for debate and argument. So a member of congress pass around copies of material to other members of congress regardless of copyright.

        I’m also pretty sure the government can’t legally start streaming all the Disney movies to federal employees without permission. I’m not sure where the line between these twoexamples is however.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 minutes ago

          congress can ignore copyright for debate and argument

          Analysis and review are fair uses available to everyone.

          military guys claim the govt has complete fair use which I doubt

          The military does have fairly broad ability to violate, or even nationalize (and then classify), copyright and patents. Technically they have to justify that with a national security claim, but those are rarely reviewed or rejected. I doubt any of the U.S. armed forces pays for a public performance fee when barracks movie night exceeds 10 individuals, even if the movie is Disney.

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Good! Fuck letting Nazis appropriate anything into their culture of bigotry and hate.

        • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          There ain’t shit. These fools are just lying. Don’t forget “Disposable Heros” or “One.” They’ve expressed their views on the military using their music in a negative way. This is from before the culture wars of 2015 began.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          i’m trying to find a link after the other poster asked it but they’ve been far more supportive of israel than is appropriate

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Their whole schtick is being as unlikable as possible, not sure why anyone would be surprised.